You're data seems to steer you towards seeing anything outside your Belief Systems preference as bad, to me, from what I take from the choice of metaphors you use.
I think it's just a misunderstanding regarding the reference to living at the animal level and possibly some jumping to conclusions regarding my intent
I see it as a continuum between natural animal behavior all the way over to the complete neurotic negation of primal urges, and part of the game is being aware of the array of choices and then having the courage to try options outside your upbringing and comfort zone.
The same goes for ones practical life, zero to 100% continuum
The same goes for the higher ruleset
The monk lifestyle is as close as you get to 0 0 100, entirely devoted to the higher ruleset
It's not clear to me where Tom stands on this
33 33 33? Balance?
Someone in prison, might be 90 10 0, truly bad but ineffective dude
Or they equally could be 40 5 45, just little impulse control but heart of gold
It seems clear though that TOE is all about the higher ruleset score, which is what impacts your QoC and feedback
The only big picture importance of material or sexual concerns that we have been discussing is how they impact those you interact with or who are stakeholders in your decisions