For a scientist, MBT should be very simple to understand and they usually require long and logical explanations rather than blogs.
MBT wasnt written for the scientist. Books aren't written for scientists. For a scientist, MBT is about as logical as The Bible or Journeys out of the body. Scientists want academic papers and experiments, not books.
Even if Tom's experiments are as predicted, do not expect scientists to go "AHA, he was right!". Expect a lot of resistance.
Maybe, maybe not. Certainly there has been a lot of resistance already. The fact is, testable predictions alone already puts MBT on a higher tier compared to all other models.
You know I recall in Tom's interview with Dean Radin that Dean asked him about what MBT had to say about Deans yet to be done double slit experiment. If i'm not mistaken Tom was right about the outcome.