Return Home

My Big Toe Forum

Discussion and explanation of the writings of Tom Campbell

To register for the forum, click here

It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 8:19 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Forum rules


Do not make an initial post to start a new thread on this forum once you advance beyond the beginner level of posts. This forum is an experiment with the purpose of encouraging the participation of those who have so far only hung out in the background and looked over the bulletin board. It is intended to be a place where things are orderly for beginners without the free interaction of the main board. Post only with care for the recognition that we are welcoming a new member and not arguing with a fellow old timer. Your cooperation is appreciated.



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 4:20 pm 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:08 pm
Posts: 13
Hi everyone
I've been thinking a lot about the reality I'm living, so confusing. There isn't one event in the past, close o distant without revisionism.
I can't grab a picture of the reality (of the present) without having some secured bases.
If a group of remote viewers (or database seers of any kind) would review certain key events or key people, could I use this information as a secure foundation to draw a scheme of the reality? Or different groups would obtain different results? Should I been required to obtain the information by myself?

Particularly, it's important for me to know how accurate is the knowledge left by spiritual leaders as Bhudda, Jesus, Mahoma, etc.

Thanks for you time


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 4:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:16 pm
Posts: 7060
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Look in general for the parts that are in agreement among those teachers you wish to evaluate, including considering what science has to say in total. That area of agreement or congruence is the fertile ground from which to grow your own understanding.

To give you an example of what I am saying, the Buddha and ancient metaphysicians speak of Indra's Net, Tom Campbell describes the Reality Wide Web, Robert Monroe (explorer more than teacher) describes data coming from and returning to a something which is the source of our reality and that data creates our reality and finally Carlos Castaneda describes Don Juan as describing also a source and return of data from something which creates our reality by that data. Thus I would give some credence to anyone who taps into this general concept of our reality/experience coming from a data flow within which we participate. Tom's description is the most complete, using scientific metaphors rather than just general metaphors. The others can be related to Tom's description. Does this make sense to you?

Ted


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:21 pm 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:08 pm
Posts: 13
Well, I can take your words as an answer for the final part of my question. And it makes sense. Thanks
But, what about the part about remote viewing and the reliability of the actual inherited information and/or the hypothetical "obtained" information?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:43 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:53 am
Posts: 2439
If I understand your question rightly, die.... well, I guess I don't. :-)

It sounds like you would use the findings of a passel of remote viewers to outline some sort of world view with...?

Why would anyone do that...?

You have to build your own ... otherwise what you wind up with won't really be yours, and very likely won't fit you too well either. And remote viewers are at at least as capable of being wrong as a group Let's-just-settle-in-and-view-what's-right-here-under-our-nose-viewers.

But maybe I misunderstood.

-Montana


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:43 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:16 pm
Posts: 7060
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Do not base your activities on what others say. Investigate for yourself. Remote viewers produce approximations at best.

Ted


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:06 pm 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:08 pm
Posts: 13
I'm searching for alternatives to the fact that I can't remote view nor nothing similar.
But perhaps I could motivate to the right people to collaborate to find answers.
I would want answers to my questions now, not in my 70s.
On the other hand, if there are people in this forum that can explore the database, could they generate an optimal mechanism to facilitate the access to others. (something like the definitive hemisync, for example)?
I have no problem with the meditation, and I enjoy it, but like a tool I see it little efficient. It requires an undetermined amount of time to advance.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 6:31 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:53 am
Posts: 2439
.......Sooo ... you want to evolve RIGHT NOW, even if you need to get someone else do it for you ...?
Is that how it is?

Montana


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:17 pm 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:08 pm
Posts: 13
No, it isn't.
I want to evolve AS SOON AS POSSIBLE and I would accept any kind of help from anyone or mechanism (except drugs).
And I want to propagate this evolution to everyone and facilitate it as much as possible.
If this is what it seems to be, I feel obliged to share this.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:05 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:53 am
Posts: 2439
Well, Okay. If that's what you REALLY want...

All you have to do is to have the sincere intent to do so. Basically, just open your arms to the sky and say "I want to evolve all the way! Right now! Let's get on with it!"

Just so you have some clue about where you are heading with that.... the automatic-operating spirit guide crowd has absolutely NO sense of middling degrees or moderation: There will presently be freight train's worth of "growth experience" heading your way. The experience is something like walking into a restaurant and banging your fist on the counter and saying "I got a pocket full 'o money and I am damned hungry! Feed me everything!" ...and presently the entire restaurant's supply of food is dumped on top of you... but it doesn't stop there... they order as much as possibly can be delivered and presently bulldozer-sized portions of 'comestibles' are being pushed in your direction.

It is conceivable that things will go a little more smoothly with an intent that was closer to "Lookit. I want to evolve. Give me the next thing I need in the process. Thanks."

Happy Trails!~


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:41 pm 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:08 pm
Posts: 13
It's much easier to evolve if you can "see" the "real" reality or at least a greater portion of it.
Following an analogy, it was very easy for the followers of Jesus to believe and conceive a broader reality, having a man doing all kind of wonders.

I have listened to Thomas and Dennis talking about their changes when (after) they discovered and experienced the reality.
So I'm not asking for any exaggerated event. I would like to everyone would have the opportunity of Thomas and others.
Perhaps I sound a bit stressing in my questions but it's only I'm a bit temperamental when the events seem crucial to me.
I have found a treasure and I want to share with as much people as possible, and now I'm thinking in my family, my friends, my colleagues.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:05 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 6:35 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Chicago
Dieguti,

Congrats on wanting to evolve. You say you want something like, firsthand experience of the larger reality. That's cool, but why not suspend that notion for a bit. Learn to meditate, and over time, you'll get your proof. Worst case scenario, even if you never get firsthand proof of the larger reality, through meditation, you'll make yourself healthier and happier. So you gain in both cases, its worth the effort. Patience :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 3:08 am 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:08 pm
Posts: 13
I don't understand your (Montana, Ted, Willmeister) reticence to my proposal.
I'm asking that someone with the capacity to "navigate" the database or to communicate with higher beings to design a focus 12 inducer (for example, not literally).
Everyone who has experienced the greater reality appreciates the event as very important in his life.
Why won't you facilitate this to everyone interested?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 5:32 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:16 pm
Posts: 7060
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
dieguti,

Finally you come closer to making a clear statement of what you mean. Is what you are saying that you wish someone would produce a technical means by which you could do exploration? If that is the case, there are tools available from The Monroe Institute or of a more do it yourself in terms of adjustability and modification on the Internet and more than one thread on the board discussing them.

We keep balking at what you say because it keeps sounding like you want someone else to do it for you. You must yourself learn to contact and experience the Larger Consciousness System. That is something that you simply must face. That this may take time is also an aspect of the situation that you must face.

If I am still not understanding what you are talking about, you must realize that you are not making it clear and make an effort to clarify it.

Ted


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 10:42 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:53 am
Posts: 2439
The operating theory is that each entity is at a particular stage ...where ever that may be .... of its evolution, and that the circumstances, environment, milieu in which that entity finds itself is exactly suited to its learning 'the next thing(s)' that it 'should'. (The 'shouldness' here is more often a matter, as I understand it, of correcting for balance rather than some sort of moral or scholastic or doctrinaire imperavative.)

Dumping folks in a nice big vat of focus-12 before they are good swimmers in focus 1 .... in what circumstances might that be a good idea? There might be some, in fact, but... ?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 27, 2012 7:52 pm 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 5:08 pm
Posts: 13
Pardon me all. I didn't notice I was being so unclear.
I will try to summarize:
- I think that experience the reality is positive for the people, 99%.
- Access that reality isn't easy (I've meditated and tried hemi sync for months without success)
- ANY information can be obtained from the database from a person with the capability to do it.
- I propose that the designed person generate (or copy from the database) a system, I suppose it would be based in sound, to facilitate the access to states of the kind of focus 10 or focus 12 in any newbie.
- I want to use that system. I want access those states by myself.

And respect to Montana I disagree; if someone will want use that system I think he will be prepared to live the experience. I'm not going to push anyone, only offer it.
And finally I don't want to rest value to meditation, but I don't think it would be the best tool to achieve certain altered states. I have family that have meditated for years and never accessed any of these nonphysical realities.
But again, I like meditation and I practice almost daily.
I'm a computer engineer and I have the concept based in the experience of my job that half of the effort (if not more) can be saved if one choose the right tool for the task.

Thanks for your time.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group