MeClam wrote:
Its as if you say and do things with the idea that those are not connected to you in any way. That you can change the flow of a river not because you want to or because you need to but because you simply can as a manifestation of your skill.
That you can clearly state by your own measurement and judgement the difference in levels between you and Bette as if these are facts without realizing that by simply believing in the concept of short that you created the illusion of long.
That you can say I am not competing yet you can't resist to brag yourself at a higher level. What is the point at telling kids in kindergarten school that because you are in high school you can never be at their level...this is a dumb thing to say since it is a fact. If this is a fact and there are levels of magnitude between you and Bette what is the point of bringing this up besides as a method of putting her down? by your own words you say it will create frustration in her just to know this.
You write your preconceived intent of messing with her ego, then you mess with her ego and state the results it could cause, then you finish by being innocent.... how?
Maybe because you don't want to reach the obvious conclusion that only a highschooler with the mentality of a Kindergarten would bother in doing what you just did.
MeClam: You are full of beliefs here. If I am aware of how I compare to others that does not mean I brag about it. It is natural on me. It is you that thinks that I brag. I am honest and at some point if I say "I don't care" I really mean it. I may care later though. If at some point I feel I don't care about
Bette it is because I choose to help others or put my energy in things I can change in a positive way. If whatever I tried to be positive with her fails because he cannot stand the way I am I am better of not thinking too much about her and put my mind on other things and other people. Like I am doing now with you. It is not
Bette and me any more, now is whoever is involved. Everybody is different, I don't know if you get that.
MeClam wrote:
Maybe because you don't want to reach the obvious conclusion that only a highschooler with the mentality of a Kindergarten would bother in doing what you just did.
This proves to me you are not capable of doing good omsing. You haven't read the reasons I wrote or you ignored them. You jumped to conclusions that have no basement. If I detect that you are not capable of doing good analysis, that does not mean I brag about me being better than you. I really don't care if I am better than you in omsing. I am at my level, and you are at your level. You are good for A,B,C and I may be good for D,E,F. We can all live in peace being different.
Claudio