Ted Vollers wrote:
Not going through all of your posts and the threads and replies, I come up relatively quickly and easily with 6 others besides myself and gave you the benefit of the doubt on one other in various threads who have pointed out your deviations from understanding and logic.
That means nothing. Sayin' it don't make it so. Lining up a half dozen illogical opinions is easy to do. Especially if they are of a Liberal mindset. Then they can all be expected to make the same errors that lead to a Liberal viewpoint.
There are others who avoid threads within which you post for dislike of participating in or reading about contention. You are not exactly a purveyor of sweetness and light, logic and sensiblity where ever you go but rather much the opposite.
I am very logical and very sensible but I do understand that I will not appear as sweetness and light to Liberals who will usually bristle at the mere thought of being exposed to Conservative viewpoints. I find that the more logical and compelling the presentation is the more upset the Liberals will be.
You rant and you rave (somewhat cured but apparently natural to your communications),
False. Please provide an example
You on the other hand are prone to ranting and unlike you I will provide backup; this post that I am replying to is exhibit A -- a long rant of false and unsubstantiated accusations backed up with zip. You have done this multiple times.
you pontificate, you bluster and most significantly, you never answer questions nor rebut arguments with facts,
False. Please provide an example (to the first part)... and I have frequently answered questions and I have rebutted arguments that were actually made.
What I do not do is bark and run off on a wild goose chase on command. The, "here, go read this book or giant link and that will support my claim" nonsense won't fly with me. A quote from the link must be provided clearly presenting the supporting point from the large text in order to be considered a valid support for a claim that is challenged. You clearly do not understand this which is why you repeatedly make false accusations against me. If you make up your own rules of your own version of another popular game without getting agreement from the players first, don't be surprised if they don't follow your made up rules. The default condition that is generally accepted is that the onus of proof is on the one who makes the original claim
, when challenged.
I do not know how many times I have tried to explain this to you. If a Liberal makes a False claim and I challenge by saying that is not so, the ball is now back in the Leftist court and the onus of proof is on the one who made the original claim, NOT the one who made the challenge.
you only divert and attempt to confuse the issue with these diversions, non replies and bullying.
False. Please provide an example
You are not the first here exhibiting these characteristics. The others are gone, willingly or otherwise, and we remain. If I vaguely remember correctly, there has been at least one who learned better interactions and stayed. What is your choice? You have had many opportunities to learn better interactions but seem adamantly opposed to the concept. Is it a choice that I will have to make for you? At present you are the major distraction from the normal purposes of this board.
Actually Ted, my posts on the political thread were some of the most MBT relevant in the bunch. Your opening salvos were pure political rants filled with insults and false accusations. (Tea-baggers, Nazi-Hitler-Brownshirts, etc.)
Note that I am not here to convince you how wrong you and your Leftist compadres are. I am here to find out a few things about MBT and as a secondary pastime I refute Leftist deception along the way... for those with ears to hear.
If the Forum moderator happens to be an intractable, irrational Leftist who is incapable of tolerating dissenting opinion I may be removed for my failure to tuck my tail between my legs and expose my jugular.
If I am banned it will only demonstrate clearly that there is a double standard being applied here because you, Ted, are wayyy more guilty of the very things you accuse me of. Pure projection at work.
Here is an example of how I included MBT concepts on these political threads; Ted, my motivation for pointing out Leftist deception is similar to your stated desires in starting this thread. I have come to understand how "getting traction" and reducing entropy is far more consistent with small government and higher individual freedom. I see that the present Democrat Agenda is counter to the whole point of this Reality System and does not serve higher Consciousness.
As Dennis Prager says, "The bigger the government the smaller the citizen".
(and the less traction one can get, imho)
I made other comments of an MBT nature but no one replied to them. They just replied irrationally to the Conservative ideas that so predictably upset the garden variety Leftist.
If I have made any claims that you think I have not backed up just ask. Quote me exactly and just ask. Continually repeating a false accusation does not get us anywhere.