Return Home

My Big Toe Forum

Discussion and explanation of the writings of Tom Campbell

To register for the forum, click here

It is currently Fri May 24, 2013 2:33 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Fri Feb 05, 2010 5:00 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:34 am
Posts: 1289
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
chet baker wrote:
Sorry we could not be of more help,
>
> Skip Atwater
> The Monroe Institute

greets chet
Wow, that was really nice of Skip to respond to you personally.

I love the interview he gave where he described his first visit to the Institute. ("what, did you drop your wallet?") <-- that won't make sense to you if you haven't watched the video :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:44 am 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 15
ok, here is the deal...

i heard tom campbell on coast to coast and he talks about the evidence (tapes/soundbooth etc.)he created in the monroe labs...he thought "oh my god it's real!" and talked about, how important it was for him to prove that he wasn't hallucinating.
why diddn't he put this tapes in a golden safe?
why is it not as important now, as it was back then?
isn't there a understanding for people who like to have the evidence?
recreate it! put it on youtube! lets all be part of it!
it's much more than pure entertainment, it could provide the crucial spark for many people to
wake up, to a larger reality.
pick us up where we are right now: stuck in pmr, in desperate need of convincing data...

any thoughts?

greets chet


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:47 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2009 1:54 pm
Posts: 2781
Location: Miami, FL
chet wrote:
pick us up where we are right now: stuck in pmr, in desperate need of convincing data...

any thoughts?


I may try to help you out to convince yourself. Are you desperate to experience NPMR? I can try to help you experience NPMR. Not guaranteed though. PM me.

Clau

_________________
"Every moment can be as good as you want it to be."
"Experience is the ultimate teacher."

> http://soprano.com <


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:46 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:16 pm
Posts: 7068
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Chet,

Have you not seen the links to the Monroe Institute recordings on this BB? This is limited data from the past. Sort of like checking out the performance specs on a model T roadster instead of the latest Corvette or Lamborghini or something modern. My Big TOE travels far beyond the limited viewpoint of that early exploration and discovery period.

Here is a link to a thread where ObjectiveMind posted a full listing of their links.
viewtopic.php?f=23&t=3879

Tom went far beyond that and takes the approach that the only true proof any more is to experience it for yourself. With this I agree. Not everyone will experience the same thing, but you can all learn that your experience amounts to proof by its interlinked results within your own experience.

Ted


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 6:14 am 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 15
ted,

I listened earlier to some of the tapes at the monroe institute website,
but so far I could't find a tape/video recording that gave me the evidence I'm looking for.
maybe your link leads to the evidence...thank you for posting it.

greets chet


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 7:31 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:32 pm
Posts: 829
Location: Statesville, NC
Chet,

The one you're looking for, where Tom and Dennis travel together and experience the same things, is no longer available per information someone here received from the institute. I agree that it is strange that something seemingly of such great importance was lost. Of course, the truth is that for the participants it did not need to be retained. The effect it had on the participants was the important thing. Tom passed a critical threshhold from believer to knower.
Those of the Explorer tapes that are available are a fascinating insight into how the Explorers were operating at the time. Changing states of consciousness and conversing with nonphysical beings were all in a day's work for them. It won't provide proof to true non-believers. They will write it off as hallucinations or out right fabrications on the part of the Explorers. To me, that theory is almost equally unlikely, as that would require the participants to all be highly intelligent and creative beings who were quick on the draw to provide the material that came through in response to unscripted questions from Monroe. It's possible, but not probable, that all of the participants were so well equipped.
Consciousness exploration is highly subjective and personal. I think, like Tom in his experience with Dennis, the only absolute proof you will find is through your own experience. The ah ha moment will come eventually if you stick with it. Then you will be convinced, and that is all that matters.

Ramon


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:23 am 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 15
Ramon,

True. And amazingly I'm on my way now. I had some great lucid dreams, with guides in the form of Albert Einstein and Robert Monroe, who told me how to work in NPMR (flying, going through walls etc.). It was realy amazing. Funny enough I had to leave my normal dreamstate and went through a tunnel to get to them, same on the way out...

greets Chet


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:07 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 6:32 pm
Posts: 829
Location: Statesville, NC
Chet,

That's awesome man! It definitely sounds like you're on your way.

The dream state is a great conduit for NPMR information. For several years, I have been having precognitive info coming through occasionally. It seems to always be symbolic, though, and meaningful after the fact. Sort of like, "Ah, so that's what that was about." Too bad because the information could be useful if I only understood what it meant beforehand. I'm working on it though.

Ramon


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:41 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:35 am
Posts: 10214
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Hi Chet,
If you find yourself there again with Bob could you find out if he ever received a personally signed book from Louis Gittner called "Words From The Source", if you think of it, please? If it works that way. If you came back with what is actually signed in the book, well, unless I've already written it here somewhere (and you were mean, which I think is NOT the case), that would be VERY interesting. Tell Al I said hi, and that I love him, please, seriously. Thank you.
Love
Bette

_________________
All That Is
what is?
Consciousness.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 8:58 am 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 15
hi bette,

as you wish...:-) but I think of them more as guides who appear in a form (a person) that I would trust.
but I don't know for sure...what do you think?

greets chet


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Fri Mar 26, 2010 9:46 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:23 pm
Posts: 581
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
I can tell you this:

When Greta and I first started to experiment with the Ouija board, we spontaneously had a contact come through claiming to be... you guessed it: Bob Monroe. I asked "Bob" if there was anything he could say to us to "prove" who he was. He simply said, "Far Journeys." Then we proceeded to ask questions and "he" proceeded to answer them, kindly and politely. I was actually pretty convinced that we were talking to the personality who had been Bob incarnate. Then I decided to ask Tom about it... and here is what he said (directly pasted from an email):

Tom Campbell, in an email wrote:
Cole,



Bob Monroe, as the world knew him, was a unique PMR character that no longer exists. That was a character that was played in PMR some time ago. The IUOC from which that PMR character sprang still exists, but it is no longer playing Bob Monroe in PMR - it may be playing Joe Blow, but Joe Blow, developing his own unique experience base in PMR, is not Bob Monroe. The historical Bob is captured in the database as Bob Monroe - with all the choices and their associated probabilities intact but with no free will.



I doubt that you are talking to Bob Monroe - You are most likely talking to someone who is claiming to represent Bob. They may or may not actually be representing Bob accurately from the database - but probably not. Ask your Bob what his mother's maiden name was and the names of his children. Then AFTER he tells you, go find out.



Tom



Cole, in response wrote:
Thanks Tom,

I do actually agree with what you're saying to a certain extent-- Bob Monroe, as 'he was' is no longer. But since the entity from which he sprang still exists- then couldn't that entity still use Bob's personality and experience base as a means for communicating with us? In other words- since there is no real division between one, and one's entity/oversoul/higher-self- then isn't this essentially 'Bob' IF in fact it is his greater IUOC that's communicating with us?


Tom in further response wrote:
Bob and his IUOC would likely have different personalities. Bob is a subset of his IUOC. That would not be Bob any more than any of the other of his last half dozen incarnations.





-Cole

_________________
Never live so certainly as to confuse your own convictions with what is true.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Sat Mar 27, 2010 8:18 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 9:53 am
Posts: 2439
That was informative, Cole, thanks for sharing that.

Several interesting points to puzzle over in there!

-Montana


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2010 4:42 am 
Offline
Normal User
Normal User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:19 pm
Posts: 15
cole,

interesting thoughts.
I will try to ask the questions Tom mentioned, although I have a feeling
these guys are "just" guides, trying to make me feel comfortable.

- chet


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 12:03 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 22, 2008 7:05 pm
Posts: 150
I avoid ouija boards. Too easy to get what you don't want!

Tom's experiments with Bob can be duplicated. It takes a little bit of audio engineering, very little, Three people, two of which can do OOBE and talk with their PMR bodies at the same time.

With two people on microphones in different rooms, one on the left channel and one on the right channel, both going OOBE to the same place and conversing out loud is all it takes. Record and play back and there you have it.

_________________
Most people are mostly good most of the time. - the Deefburger assumption of marginal probable personal state.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: study citations
PostPosted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 6:46 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:34 am
Posts: 1289
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Tom Campbell, in an email wrote:
Cole,

Bob Monroe, as the world knew him, was a unique PMR character that no longer exists. That was a character that was played in PMR some time ago. The IUOC from which that PMR character sprang still exists, but it is no longer playing Bob Monroe in PMR - it may be playing Joe Blow, but Joe Blow, developing his own unique experience base in PMR, is not Bob Monroe. The historical Bob is captured in the database as Bob Monroe - with all the choices and their associated probabilities intact but with no free will.
...
Tom
Cole, in response wrote:
Thanks Tom,
I do actually agree with what you're saying to a certain extent-- Bob Monroe, as 'he was' is no longer. But since the entity from which he sprang still exists- then couldn't that entity still use Bob's personality and experience base as a means for communicating with us? In other words- since there is no real division between one, and one's entity/oversoul/higher-self- then isn't this essentially 'Bob' IF in fact it is his greater IUOC that's communicating with us?
Tom in further response wrote:
Bob and his IUOC would likely have different personalities. Bob is a subset of his IUOC. That would not be Bob any more than any of the other of his last half dozen incarnations.
Cole, thank you for sharing this with us. I agree with Montana, it gives us a lot to chew on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group