For Claudio if he will pay attention and anyone else interested in seeing the source material that I have been explaining and Claudio disputing:
Ted, conditioning or labeling does not define or create truth. You are not the teacher here and I the student. Ted Vollers is not just superior to Claudio Soprano. Only you create this fantasy that the problem was me not paying attention and I don't care what some people may think, I know what is on my mind. You were not explaining anything only till this last post when you finally decided to put your ego on the side and your apparent "know it all" attitude and decided to explain some things in order. I put things in order and explained things on this thread before you did. You tend to always take care of defending your condition of being the teacher of the board after Tom. Only after my efforts and because of extending this post you decided to do some real effort and work.
AUM's fundamental time period: 10^-80 s
NPMR's fundamental time period: 10^-62 s
PMR's fundamental time period: 10^-44 s
These periods you describe here are not different from the periods I mentioned before you but before you doing some thinking and analysis you said:
If you will look at the page header information on the page you reference or simply go back to the first page of the chapter, you will see that what you are referencing is from My Big TOE| Probable Futures, Real Time, Our System, State Vectors, and History. In this and other associated chapters Tom is discussing the implementation of state delta ts between the various PMRs and NPMRs of OS and such matters. In other words, just what the chapter title says. What I was discussing is the way that our experience as individual consciousnesses or IUOCs of our participation is put together out of/within CS. How we as IUOCs time share our attention between the various activities within which we participate and may be conscious of.
There is simply no validity to your statement that I do not understand and am not correct in terms of what I am speaking about, based on the material that you reference. You have simply picked up material referring to delta ts that you find appropriate to what you want to prove and claimed that it is pertinent and disproves what I was saying. It is not pertinent and is totally unrelated. You might as well be disputing my saying that dinner will be served in a half hour by quoting from a treatise on time dilation at significant fractions of the speed of light. I may or may not be in error in my statement, but your referenced material has nothing whatsoever to do with this or prove it one way or the other.
Not relating the 2 sets of time cycles (delta-ts at all labels) described in 2 different chapters is either ignorance or laziness of thinking in your part Ted (I prefer to think the 2nd one). If you cannot relate that all those delta-ts are the same you may have to re-read some parts of the books again. Now you don't say anything about your previous mistakes in my opinion because you have this typical sequence (1. I am mostly always right and Claudio is mostly always missinterpreting, 2. (optional), let's do some analysis). I wish you always start with this type of post (your last one), to avoid all this back and forward.
So our IUOC, the basic total code that is all of us as both functionality and data in digital format is present and busy functioning as an integral part of AUM for all of these time ticks for AUM.
Compare this to what I posted before on this thread:
An IUOC can have multiple CPUs (like our present processors Duo, Quad, etc.). So each light of multiple lights can keep running the CPUs 24/7 despite the lights being on or off (running in stand by mode, like a notebook computer when in sleep mode).
You see, the higher self (playing the computer games at home), does not stop playing his game every time the one at school (FWAU) is doing something. The IUOC does multiprocessing, not just handles one process at a time.
But in any case, what is stated several times in this thread is that "you" or "I" as FWAUs are not the real "YOU" or "I" and the "YOU" and the "I" function in a continuous way in CS in all levels (PMR,OS,NPMR(N),NPMR,CS). The IUOCs don't spread their cycles on each level, some cycles here, some cycles there, but always ticking at the root level and then as participating on each subset levels. We are not sharing a single CPU with some cycles for PMR and not NPMR and viceversa but rather multiprocessing as stated in my last quote from Tom in my previous long post. At root level we all tick continuously as part of AUM's pulses. Let's don't confuse delta t's use for VRs with delta t's of IUOCs, or Consciousness or Players of VRs, even though we may have to "sync" with the corresponding VR clocks.
Now compare your last quote above and the related information on your thread with these previous statements from you:
Tom has described before the way that CS cycles are used for PMR, NPMR and CS uses in a recurring round robin. Time sharing. It is in MBT and I have referred to it before as the basis for talking about our VR experiences as time sharing of our IUOC as first it receives a cycle of one VR, then the other VR and then a lot of cycles are devoted to the functioning or our IUOC as part of the CS doing whatever it does there as a part of the whole.
You catch an NPMR cycle and then a PMR cycle and then your IUOC as your higher self goes and does its own thing for other cycles.
This is an error, because an IUOC can parallel process all experiences of its VR selves plus NPMR experiences (all becomes a system that multiprocess with different aspects taking care of their stuff). An IUOC can multiprocess, a FWAU can also multiprocess, but even if a FWAU does not parallel process an IUOC can parallel process or multiprocess, it does not need to handle different cycles in serial mode. I prefer you admit your errors, instead of focusing on my possible missunderstandings. I was trying to help you understand, not the other way around that you insist on projecting to the board. I don't know if you want to create some magic to keep consistency adding some conditions that you couldn't have been wrong in your previous posts.
Regarding your last post (good post), I cannot detect anything wrong except for this part:
If we participate in additional NPMR or PMR experiences, our IUOC forms another FWAU to receive and perceive those time frames, just like for our primary experiences of NPMR and PMR.
An IUOC can perceive time frames in parallel, as the IUOC (mainly higher self) operates (it multiprocess in parallel). A FWAU can also process in parallel or remote view or be an spectator of other reality frames without creating a FWAU for that. Also, an FWAU can also temporarily co-process another FWAU's experience in another reality frame experiencing that other FWAU either as an spectator or taking part of the control process.