Ted Vollers wrote:
Can't you keep your attitudes under control? Try harder. It is unfortunate, if we must consider age, that you have apparently not learned anything since you were 12 perhaps. The attitude that you know everything and no one else knows anything keeps seeping out. Bette's attitude regarding science has more justification that this one of your superiority does. If physics had no mistakes and wrong directions in its history, then why has the paradigm changed so many times? If QM were fully understood, why would there be so much factional disagreement within the ranks of physicists. Contrary to your dearly beloved beliefs, there is no indication that they have it figured out yet.
How old are you? Just wondering because I never asked. Anyways, thanks, I know my attitude isn't pretty and full of delight, however there is nothing wrong arguing with enemies of reason. I am trying to be collective and approach these issues without much intolerance, but it becomes really hard when it's obvious some people here don't know the reality they are in very well. We need reasonable people whom are comprehensive in today's society in my opinion.
I never said science is a done deal. Why do people keep insisting that I have or am saying that? I never said QM is fully understood, I never said that physics had no mistakes (Yeah, I'm dumb and don't realize the difference made from Newton's gravity and Einstein's gravity or any of the other paradigms in science). I never said any of whatever you're thinking I said. The paradigm changes because we continue to learn fact from fiction. A better understanding out of the present calculations and observations. I never said they [science] figured out everything for the umpteenth time. I am however pretty sure that more is being figured out by scientists in action right now than what is going on here however.
Bette's argument is extremely irrational and it always has been. It gives me the baffles how each time she gives irrational and vague details on her beliefs that I am told that I do not see or do not get it. Am I supposed to think much simpler, like a child? If so, sure I get it. Am I supposed to think reasonably and scientifically? I like to, as it seems to give me a better understanding of reality and a lower conscious entropy in the process. It also gives me a much grander understanding of consciousness from my perspective and interpretation. So no, I do not get Bette's explanation, it is based on quite a few umbrella terms and no where close to specific enough to answering anything.
I've also studied spirituality and mysticism too, among other seemingly fictional subjects. It's more of a curiosity of information or knowledge rather than just science in my case.