I am still putting some of the implications together, still have yet to assemble all the details, have yet to master all the language of MBT-speak.

But it seems to me at this point that among the premier consequences of Tom's theory is that ALL models, ALL structures in consciousness, can be rendered into a digital format. ONE of the upshots of this is that ALL such models or consciousness structures can be rendered in terms of one another. The air is pretty thin at this altitude, so let me put it this way:

The theory suggests that a universal translator could and eventually will be fabricated such that any item of consciousness could be translated from one being to another... like a universal translator, complete with an efficiency of transference rating. This is enormously powerful when you think of the implications.

The theory also suggests that there is typology of consciousness structures, and ultimately these will be studied, categorized according to properties, and their strengths and weakness for particular applications understood. Further, it will create a structure (model) that will predict possible but as yet unknown or unemployed structures in consciousness. I say 'structures' and that sounds static, really these are more like dynamic, iterating, living processes, and more. Pretty slick!

The theory also provides a path a solid framework for belief system independence.... what a breath of fresh air THAT is!

I suspect that many people have a hard time fathoming the TOE, and that is because of the extreme altitude (level of abstraction) that is its habitat, so to speak.... the air is quite a bit thinner than most minds care to fly in. Including me, I should add... that is not a fault of the theory though, just an indicator of the heaviness of my wings, so to speak. Personally I am much more interested in the 'street level' applications for now, but some day I trust I shall have evolved to a point where I can access a level (or style) of consciousness that can render any data suite out digitally, and reprocess from there.

The whole "it's all about love" business, I do not doubt, but I have yet to master even a crude complete understanding of it. It is a lesson set that I look forward to having completed... it is a bumpy road, I understand.

-Montana

Montana,

You are apparently getting there. It is not so much that: "ALL models, ALL structures in consciousness, can be rendered into a digital format" as that they are inherently digital in nature. The bottom layer of reality is the digital reality cells with their data and code which exist layer by layer with each delta t of the CS 'clock'. That is really the only 'layer' to our reality. That layer can be traced back to the Void which ancient metaphysicians to modern mystics, including Tom, have contacted and is the level or beginning layer from which it ALL started. Everything exists within that digital layer and nowhere else. You as an IUOC exist there. The RWW exists there as a digital data highway, somewhat like the Internet or WWW, and interconnects you as a digital being, an IUOC, to all of the other IUOCs that exist and to 'structures' such as you refer to like TBC and the EBC. Everything that exists exists within that layer of digital code and data, interacting reality cell to reality cell. That is all there is as the mother layer of all that exists as digital structures.

Then you have the 'layer' as you might call it of structures as the Virtual Realities. Not a separate layer, still within the base layer as nothing is not within that base layer of digital data, but functioning as a structure. The 'structure' that we as FWAUs, subsets of our IUOCs, experience as our VR experiences. TBC projects a given VR through its own delta t increments based upon probability and uses its VRRE function to generate a specific digital data stream which represents our VR experience. This VR experience data stream is fed to us individually as IUOCs to provide the VR experience to us as IUOCs/FWAUs.

There you have the whole thing in a small nutshell. You can model this with more structure as you will and can discover. A fractal arrangement of VRs. A fractal structure to the RWW perhaps. None of us can 'see' this like a 3D being standing up in Flatland other than as an intellectual modeling. This is so because we each and every one and everything else that exists exists within that same digital Consciousness System that is AUM and where dimensions as in PMR 3D do not in fact exist.

Apply this to what you have said and perhaps you will see what I have said many times here on the board and what Tom described within his trilogy of My Big TOE.

Ted

"The whole "it's all about love" business, I do not doubt, but I have yet to master even a crude complete understanding of it. It is a lesson set that I look forward to having completed... it is a bumpy road, I understand."

-Montana
LOL Montana,

I know what you mean. I get headaches trying to put all the "data" together into a logical framework. My strength is not in the technical area, as you might have guessed. But I do attempt to understand all the terminologies as much as possible in order to find inconsistancies between my TOE and Toms TOE. I have also tried (as much as possible ) to understand Quantum theories, String theories, as well as Einstiens theories on Relativity and his thoughts on the quantum level.

Have you noticed that the more we look at the quantum universe the more it seems to incorporate (or at least resemble) the "mystical" and paranormal? With "spooky action at a distance" and "non-local reality" together with the "fractal nature of reality" , interdimensional implications and "faster than light communication". The path to the truth really seems to lie "within".

Most of my time has been spent studying comparative religions, mythologies, physics, meta-physics, man and his symbols, as well as the overlapping of cultures, and how they have affected each other throughout history. My TOE really needed to be a BIG TOE, including everything. The Mystics of all world religions seem to say the same thing using different symbols. And strangely, the older the writings the more they seem to resemble Toms Big TOE.

My strategy has been to compare all that we now know (thru science), with all that our ancestors told us (thru ancient texts) and my theory was already well defined and my conclusions were already being formed when I read MBT. So when I heard Tom say "The opposite of love is not hate, the opposite of love is fear" I knew that this man of science was really on to something. I immediately watched his 18 part lecture and then I was sure that I needed to read his trilogy. For me, reading MBT was like reading a book written by a mystic, like something I've read before from a hindu text written 3 thousand yrs ago.

Love vs fear was at the core of my TOE and it was the result of 30 yrs of research and investigation. People do think Im nuts when I always reduce everything to LOVE vs FEAR ,lol
But Tom really summed it all up nicely in his lecture (London I think) Love is growth fear is resistance.

We are surely coming at this thing from different directions, and many people here in the forum are more adept at the "techie" part than I am, but we are climbing the same mountain.



love is the answer
patrick

_________________
LOVE is the answer

peace
patrick