Return Home

My Big Toe Forum

Discussion and explanation of the writings of Tom Campbell

To register for the forum, click here

It is currently Wed May 22, 2013 8:04 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 3:23 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:16 am
Posts: 299
Location: Salem VA.
bette wrote:
Fundamental Reality is data Fred. I've been a "bottom line" person looking for fundamental and this does work for me. Everything is derived from data even an ability to process it.
Love
Bette
Okay Bette calm down it could be, I just think that processing ability, Stuff I call it is were our data comes from. and our reality is the processing of that naturally accruing data. and that processing stuff is what AUM is along with the data. That stuff is at the base (fundamental) of the system, Data is just part of it. This is just my view. Fred searching for truth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 3:25 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:16 pm
Posts: 7060
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Fred,

It constantly seems like, with the things that you say, that you are always just on the verge of getting Tom's model:
Quote:
It could be that data floating in the void organized it self without the non physical mass I described.
But then you don't. As Maxwell Smart always said 'missed it by "that much"'. You seem to be paraphrasing his model but still not comprehending it fully. Data floating within the Void did organize itself and without any other agency that the nature of this reality as expressed in PMR pure mathematics as being inherent properties of the Void. Why would this be any more difficult to conceive of than that chemicals floating in the primordial seas and tide pools of PMR earth organized itself into life and the whole process of the evolution of consciousness and intelligence?

Ted


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:07 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:16 am
Posts: 299
Location: Salem VA.
Ted Vollers wrote:
Fred,

It constantly seems like, with the things that you say, that you are always just on the verge of getting Tom's model:
Quote:
It could be that data floating in the void organized it self without the non physical mass I described.
But then you don't. As Maxwell Smart always said 'missed it by "that much"'. You seem to be paraphrasing his model but still not comprehending it fully. Data floating within the Void did organize itself and without any other agency that the nature of this reality as expressed in PMR pure mathematics as being inherent properties of the Void. Why would this be any more difficult to conceive of than that chemicals floating in the primordial seas and tide pools of PMR earth organized itself into life and the whole process of the evolution of consciousness and intelligence?

Ted
That description seems as clear as light, The system created it self by organizing the data to become a self modifying processing system, so the data created the (data) stuff we call AUM I guess that is what you are saying. That makes since, But it still seems like there should be a force that buts it all together to become one. Some kind of stuff that intertwines with the data that grows using the data. And where this come from is some type of seeding perhaps? Fred searching for truth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:32 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:16 am
Posts: 299
Location: Salem VA.
Lumpy wrote:
fast wrote:
Lumpy wrote:
Fast, think of it like this...Before self awareness of consciousness it was "just data" in the sense that you are thinking, but that unaware data was still consciousness. Instead of intent directing the unaware consciousness all the different pieces of data were simply interacting with themselves much in the same way plants interact with the environment here without being aware. One day it just so happens that all the unaware consciousness interacting with each other took such a form as to where it developed awareness. Now instead of the data being random there was a tiny bit of intent involved. This sped up consciousness evolution, consciousness slowly began structuring itself in more efficient ways that lead to growth(more self awareness/power of intent) and eventually you get to the point where we are now. Any questions?
That seems like a possible theory, I just view it differently it seems like the stuff from where data comes from is what we really are. Unless you assume it came from nowhere. I think it was a non physical mass that naturally creates processes and modifies data. Now where that comes from who knows. This is my view based on my exploration of consciousness. But processing these things that I seem to know is so uncertain with the constraints of the virtual brain. It could be that data floating in the void organized it self without the non physical mass I described. But my intuitive feel says that does seem right. When we process data through AUM without the constraints in this VR is when we really have an accurate view of these hard questions. We probably already know most everything we just cant remember. It would not be a (VR) dream if we were awake. We are all probably idiotic and ignorant in this PMR we just don't realize it until we wake up at some point. Fred searching for truth


What I was describing, to my knowledge is exactly how Tom put it in MBT, just in different words. So it's not my theory, but the MBT view of things.

I still think you are not getting that non-physical and physical are the same thing just different perspectives. They are combined. It's not like consciousness created the data that lead to awareness. Consciousness was the data that lead to awareness; It was simply "unconscious data" until it become aware, or conscious. There is a possibility that the beginning of "consciousness"(the unaware consciousness data) came from somewhere. We just simply cannot perceive that outside knowledge so we don't want to speculate. That would be like showing a caveman a car from 2012 and asking him to figure out how it works without him understanding any of the knowledge that lead up to the technology of the automobile, and processes/things within the car.
I agree with that, I am just saying that there is another force that pulls the data together to make it coherent that leads to awareness. I call it some other kind of stuff, Data needs a base platform to become aware, That is the the way it seems to me. Fred searching for truth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:45 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:16 pm
Posts: 7060
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
Tom has discussed this. Stated that there is no way to know that there is or is not something beyond and outside of AUM, possibly a whole herd of 'aumosauruses'. To our knowledge, and in Tom's model, there is certainly nothing defined there. Unless you are going to get into one of those metaphysical speculations as to the cause behind the cause behind . . ., what are you going to speculate about? Have you ever heard the phrase, 'it's turtles all the way down'? In an early model of reality, based upon what I don't remember now, it was stated that the earth sat on the back of a gigantic tortoise. Someone among the listeners then asked, well what does the turtle stand on? Some little old lady in the audience retorted, 'it's turtles all the way down'.

You can continue to speculate as fantastically as you wish. It is however pure speculation. Tom's model begins at the same beginning point from which ancient metaphysicians have always begun and at the same thing that mystics have always experienced when they went as deeply within as it seems possible to go: the Void. Beyond that point no one has ever claimed to go. It seems that there is no such 'beyond' that exists. To make such a claim would bring questions as millenia have not produced a vision of greater depth.

Knowledge does not go deeper within NPMR. Tom has stated that spiritual knowledge as represented in Tom's model is no more widely available there in NPMR than here in PMR. Keep in mind also that Tom's model is essentially the same model as the Buddha's and ancient Indian metaphysicians came up with, just with metaphors from science instead of mysticism. As I have frequently pointed out Indra's Net = RWW and Illusion = Virtual Reality. You are insisting that we must go farther than anyone has figured out how to go in thousands of years. Well, happy trails, enjoy the trip. You are welcome to try.

Ted


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:37 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:16 am
Posts: 299
Location: Salem VA.
Ted Vollers wrote:
Tom has discussed this. Stated that there is no way to know that there is or is not something beyond and outside of AUM, possibly a whole herd of 'aumosauruses'. To our knowledge, and in Tom's model, there is certainly nothing defined there. Unless you are going to get into one of those metaphysical speculations as to the cause behind the cause behind . . ., what are you going to speculate about? Have you ever heard the phrase, 'it's turtles all the way down'? In an early model of reality, based upon what I don't remember now, it was stated that the earth sat on the back of a gigantic tortoise. Someone among the listeners then asked, well what does the turtle stand on? Some little old lady in the audience retorted, 'it's turtles all the way down'.

You can continue to speculate as fantastically as you wish. It is however pure speculation. Tom's model begins at the same beginning point from which ancient metaphysicians have always begun and at the same thing that mystics have always experienced when they went as deeply within as it seems possible to go: the Void. Beyond that point no one has ever claimed to go. It seems that there is no such 'beyond' that exists. To make such a claim would bring questions as millenia have not produced a vision of greater depth.

Knowledge does not go deeper within NPMR. Tom has stated that spiritual knowledge as represented in Tom's model is no more widely available there in NPMR than here in PMR. Keep in mind also that Tom's model is essentially the same model as the Buddha's and ancient Indian metaphysicians came up with, just with metaphors from science instead of mysticism. As I have frequently pointed out Indra's Net = RWW and Illusion = Virtual Reality. You are insisting that we must go farther than anyone has figured out how to go in thousands of years. Well, happy trails, enjoy the trip. You are welcome to try.

Ted
One thing about exploring hard questions like this thread, Is that it buts you in the mind set of finding big truth. I know it gets to a point were speculation takes over, But for some reason that desire to know seems to be deep in our nature. KAOS is how all this started, And it also gave Maxwell Smart a job. Fred searching for truth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 36 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group