Return Home

My Big Toe Forum

Discussion and explanation of the writings of Tom Campbell

To register for the forum, click here

It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:34 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 2:05 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:35 am
Posts: 10249
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
msagansk wrote:
Ted,
I guess I was trying to get a clearer picture of how the entropy of the system is affected by someone purposely manipulating free will (self and others) in the anti-rat sort of way (evil).

How does an anti-rat manipulate free will to lower it's own entropy? Is it purely through the control and force of others? The model I used to have is that love lowers entropy and fear raises entropy, but this seems to be different. But an anti-rat is lowering its own entropy without love.

Mike the concept of "Hell" as well as the training to be addicted to "God's" "love" and then the threat of losing that love is another example of the manipulation of others free will in a "bad" way, or "Evil."
Love
Bette

_________________
All That Is
what is?
Consciousness.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 2:51 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:16 am
Posts: 299
Location: Salem VA.
bette wrote:
msagansk wrote:
Ted,
I guess I was trying to get a clearer picture of how the entropy of the system is affected by someone purposely manipulating free will (self and others) in the anti-rat sort of way (evil).

How does an anti-rat manipulate free will to lower it's own entropy? Is it purely through the control and force of others? The model I used to have is that love lowers entropy and fear raises entropy, but this seems to be different. But an anti-rat is lowering its own entropy without love.

Mike the concept of "Hell" as well as the training to be addicted to "God's" "love" and then the threat of losing that love is another example of the manipulation of others free will in a "bad" way, or "Evil."
Love
Bette
Religion does seem to create more psychosis than any other belief. Everybody according to some of these fundamentalist, Are born in sin, and are going to hell if they don't believe and act a certain way. Call it what you want but I don't like many of them. Fred searching for truth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:42 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 613
bette wrote:
Mike the concept of "Hell" as well as the training to be addicted to "God's" "love" and then the threat of losing that love is another example of the manipulation of others free will in a "bad" way, or "Evil."
Love
Bette

How does that lower the entropy of the one doing the manipulation?

_________________
Mike


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 5:58 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:35 am
Posts: 10249
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
msagansk wrote:
bette wrote:
Mike the concept of "Hell" as well as the training to be addicted to "God's" "love" and then the threat of losing that love is another example of the manipulation of others free will in a "bad" way, or "Evil."
Love
Bette

How does that lower the entropy of the one doing the manipulation?
It doesn't. That's why it is "bad." There is no way to wiggle around that I'd say.
Love
Bette

_________________
All That Is
what is?
Consciousness.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 7:30 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:31 pm
Posts: 2984
Location: Florario/Ontorida
specialis_sapientia wrote:
msagansk wrote:
I'd just like to get something straight in my mind from a theoretical/intellectual point of view. Would it be fair to say that there are two kinds of "evil" described in MBT?

1. Intents that raise the entropy of the system
2. Intents that lower the entropy of the system through control and force
Mike, have you considered that while a negative being can lower its entropy (within limits) by control and force, it will always come at a cost, the being may very well lower its entropy, but that does not mean the system does. I would claim that the negative being would raise the entropy of the system by it's interactions with other beings, no matter how low entropy it would be able to get "locally". The lower the entropy of the negative being, the more potential there is for destruction and high entropy in the wake of its actions. Which of these two do you think outweighs each other, in terms of the whole system?

Some people may ask "What about the opportunity for growth caused by evil? Doesn't that make it equal out in the big picture?" No, it does not. It is only a mitigating factor, an fortunate side-effect that a few individuals of the total, grows from the experience, instead of devolves. Higher entropy in the system will still be the overall result of the destructive behaviour from negative beings.

I hope this have been of use to you.


is it possible that entropy is NPMR, and effectiveness is PMR, and that the most destructive combination is high entropy, high effectiveness?

effectiveness does not translate from one incarnation to the next, and is rather a function of culture, family, genetics

your inherent capacity/propensity for love is the only thing that transfers

there would be no "lower entropy of a negative being", which is a contradiction....?

_________________
Does this PMR make my butt look big?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 8:09 am 
Offline
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 6:16 pm
Posts: 7185
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
I think that it is appropriate to insert again Tom's clear statement of what anti rats are about. I will insert from MBT rather than simply state it so that it is clear that they are Tom's words and not an interpretation of mine.
Attachment:
AntiRatsP375.JPG
AntiRatsP375.JPG [ 39.75 KiB | Viewed 639 times ]
It should also be kept in mind that when lowering entropy is discussed, that entropy is fundamentally a measure of disorder. The 'total control of self' sought by an anti rat is clearly a matter of reducing internal disorder and thus of reducing entropy. Their efforts at external control do not lower the entropy of the Consciousness System. These expressions of external control are merely an expression of their Intent exerted externally as well as internally. Thus it appears to me.

Ted


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:08 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:23 pm
Posts: 93
A Revolation hit me, yesterday I was thinking this very thing...
I never understood, how Entities through bad intent, grow.... I had thought loving choices was how one evolved.

Heres how i see it now:
*Entites can gain understanding through harmfull acts to others. They can become very enlighted by making choices that doesn't benifit others.
Example: Antirats throwing good rats into the zapping walls to navagate the maze.

>>It comes down to kinda like a mad scientist experimenting on victoms. He learns, grows understanding, lowers entropy of himself. Also the experiences through the harmfull act can create an unsual opportuinty to become fearless.
Example: the Antirats throwing good rats in zapping walls will have very little fear of confrontation with groups of strangers.

So It makes sense to me now, why, even dangours people can have lots of understanding and insight.

To clear a tiny delima,
Those same acts they use to lower thier entropy can raise entropy just as well it depends on the value (significance) placed on the actions.
EXample: if Antirats throw good rats in zapping walls because, they think the point (significance/value) of the Maze is who can pile up enough dead rats to climb over the walls, They Understanding is devolving thus raising thier entropy.

Looking at the OVERVIEW:
The damage the lowering Entorpy antirats cuase, Then must be Mitigated.
Try to salvage the most growth out as possible. Put the right entities in the right place to salvage. THus growth can come from Tradadgey.
Like wise its possible that these Low entorpy antirats can be nudged to create a Positive growth in the collective whole...

SIdeNote:
*Force and controll can increase decision space in instances too. Having a Job, is controll and forces small set of choices, But the outcome of having money can Increase a much larger reality space.

_________________
All Praise to Dez Bryant "Feed tha Beast"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:23 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:16 am
Posts: 299
Location: Salem VA.
Ted Vollers wrote:
I think that it is appropriate to insert again Tom's clear statement of what anti rats are about. I will insert from MBT rather than simply state it so that it is clear that they are Tom's words and not an interpretation of mine.
Attachment:
AntiRatsP375.JPG
It should also be kept in mind that when lowering entropy is discussed, that entropy is fundamentally a measure of disorder. The 'total control of self' sought by an anti rat is clearly a matter of reducing internal disorder and thus of reducing entropy. Their efforts at external control do not lower the entropy of the Consciousness System. These expressions of external control are merely an expression of their Intent exerted externally as well as internally. Thus it appears to me.

Ted
It seems like they are their worst enemy, they think they are going some where by controlling things, only to find out they are falling in (Addiction) a trap, One of which has no escape but to take a
different path. This I think is natural to growing up. Seems like that is what reincarnation is for. I often wonder if we are ever going to grow up, I am sure not breaking any speed records in my efforts. Fred searching for truth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:50 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 613
Thanks Ted, that is the passage I vaguely remembered but it is good to read the details again.

Yes, it seems the external control raises the entropy of the system by limiting the free will of others (similar to what s_s mentioned earlier). A costly and selfish exchange.

Reducing internal disorder through control is part of what I was getting at with this thread. I was wondering, how is it done? I think Teridactal has given a possibility as to how. Does the obsession (desire and need) of controlling Intents overrun their intellect? i.e. Would they tend to act more at an intellectual/cerebral level than at an intuitive/being level? I suspect this to be the case, but I'm connecting some dots based on my personal experience that may not be accurate. A "mad scientist" could be the iconic representation of this.

I ask this because a common theme of MBT I've noticed is how living out of your intellect is very limiting. I used to think that living out your intellect, using rational logic, and ignoring emotions was the highest order and best way to be human (like the Vulcans in Star Trek). But I now see that living this way can make the intellect very controlling and manipulative, of self and others. For the self, it creates belief systems and thought structures that puts all experiences into nice little cubby holes, to hide away uncertainty and fear. It is then also naturally expressed outwards towards others - it cannot be helped because it is your Intent, no matter how much you try to be civil in your environment. I remember intellectually duelling many friends, using whatever tricks I had learned to come out victorious whereby by adversary either gave up in frustration or conceded the point. The battles I had lost were conveniently forgotten.

I've wanted to come to a greater understanding of the anti-rat because I see parts of it within myself.

To tie this in with the original point of the thread: To me, there seems to be two kinds of "evil" in the world. As we've just discussed, the anti-rat who tries to lower his/her own entropy through control is one case. The other case would be a being whose desire seems to be to raise entropy (of the system AND the self). This case could be labelled as "psychotics" who may be examples of those extremely rare cases where an IUOC devolves into randomness/noise or is simply deleted or reset by the LCS.

_________________
Mike


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:08 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 8:16 am
Posts: 299
Location: Salem VA.
msagansk wrote:
Thanks Ted, that is the passage I vaguely remembered but it is good to read the details again.

Yes, it seems the external control raises the entropy of the system by limiting the free will of others (similar to what s_s mentioned earlier). A costly and selfish exchange.

Reducing internal disorder through control is part of what I was getting at with this thread. I was wondering, how is it done? I think Teridactal has given a possibility as to how. Does the obsession (desire and need) of controlling Intents overrun their intellect? i.e. Would they tend to act more at an intellectual/cerebral level than at an intuitive/being level? I suspect this to be the case, but I'm connecting some dots based on my personal experience that may not be accurate. A "mad scientist" could be the iconic representation of this.

I ask this because a common theme of MBT I've noticed is how living out of your intellect is very limiting. I used to think that living out your intellect, using rational logic, and ignoring emotions was the highest order and best way to be human (like the Vulcans in Star Trek). But I now see that living this way can make the intellect very controlling and manipulative, of self and others. For the self, it creates belief systems and thought structures that puts all experiences into nice little cubby holes, to hide away uncertainty and fear. It is then also naturally expressed outwards towards others - it cannot be helped because it is your Intent, no matter how much you try to be civil in your environment. I remember intellectually duelling many friends, using whatever tricks I had learned to come out victorious whereby by adversary either gave up in frustration or conceded the point. The battles I had lost were conveniently forgotten.

I've wanted to come to a greater understanding of the anti-rat because I see parts of it within myself.

To tie this in with the original point of the thread: To me, there seems to be two kinds of "evil" in the world. As we've just discussed, the anti-rat who tries to lower his/her own entropy through control is one case. The other case would be a being whose desire seems to be to raise entropy (of the system AND the self). This case could be labelled as "psychotics" who may be examples of those extremely rare cases where an IUOC devolves into randomness/noise or is simply deleted or reset by the LCS.
I think the Vulcan's were a good model in its time, They seemed to act more from love than us. they just happened to be much smarter. Fred searching for truth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 12:10 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 613
Haha yes that's true Fred, they were a bit of a paradox that way.

_________________
Mike


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 6:56 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 10:35 am
Posts: 10249
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Perhaps there is a confusion not with entropy but with power. A lower entropy being has more Decision Space and more power while a high entropy being uses others' Decision Space taking their power seeming to have more power but really being manipulator Fear Master's.
Love
Bette

_________________
All That Is
what is?
Consciousness.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:24 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:00 pm
Posts: 613
I think there is that side of it too Bette.

_________________
Mike


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:19 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:31 pm
Posts: 2984
Location: Florario/Ontorida
Ted Vollers wrote:
I think that it is appropriate to insert again Tom's clear statement of what anti rats are about. I will insert from MBT rather than simply state it so that it is clear that they are Tom's words and not an interpretation of mine.
Attachment:
AntiRatsP375.JPG
It should also be kept in mind that when lowering entropy is discussed, that entropy is fundamentally a measure of disorder. The 'total control of self' sought by an anti rat is clearly a matter of reducing internal disorder and thus of reducing entropy. Their efforts at external control do not lower the entropy of the Consciousness System. These expressions of external control are merely an expression of their Intent exerted externally as well as internally. Thus it appears to me.

Ted


While entropy may be accurately used in this way, I would put forward that in the context of how Tom generally uses the word, in spite of the cited example, entropy should generally be reserved for, or default to, "entropy of the consciousness system", in the sense of entropy reduction=becoming love, big picture/science wise, to mitigate confusion.

A better and clearer word, that does not require qualification, would be (PMR/little picture/science) effectiveness, for this exceptional usage of PMR entropy reduction.

lets consider the syntropic (entropy reduction) cycle:

QoC->Intent->intent->decision->action->result->feedback

it could be rephrased as

[NPMR] Q0C->Intent->intent->QoC
[PMR] ->decision->action->result->feedback->effectiveness [PMR syntropy]

as intent is all that really matters for increasing QoC...you may be completely incompetent regarding translating an intent into a decision, or a decision into an action, or an action into a result, or interpreting a result into a value...all that follows forming intent is secondary

however, though effectiveness is secondary, it is non-trivial, and at some point, effectiveness becomes an issue of intent itself - effectiveness is your power to translate intent into results in PMR

at the highest levels, by way of example, this would be the lone voice at the governmental Cabinet or corporate table who speaks up for justice or the greater good...now this is beyond politically-correct knee-jerk bleeding-heart liberalism...

what we are talking about is a voice that not only draws on low entropy (big picturewise), but as well accurately perceives the machinery and incentives of PMR, in all of its dimensions, and pushes decision-making in a direction that will actually yield the result imagined, in consideration of short, medium and longer term, ultimately for the purpose of maintaining the effectiveness of the PMR lab for learning.

_________________
Does this PMR make my butt look big?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Two Kinds of Evil?
PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 6:41 am 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 28, 2010 6:31 pm
Posts: 2984
Location: Florario/Ontorida
Teridactal wrote:
A Revolation hit me, yesterday I was thinking this very thing...
I never understood, how Entities through bad intent, grow.... I had thought loving choices was how one evolved.

Heres how i see it now:
*Entites can gain understanding through harmfull acts to others. They can become very enlighted by making choices that doesn't benifit others.
Example: Antirats throwing good rats into the zapping walls to navagate the maze.

>>It comes down to kinda like a mad scientist experimenting on victoms. He learns, grows understanding, lowers entropy of himself. Also the experiences through the harmfull act can create an unsual opportuinty to become fearless.
Example: the Antirats throwing good rats in zapping walls will have very little fear of confrontation with groups of strangers.

So It makes sense to me now, why, even dangours people can have lots of understanding and insight.

To clear a tiny delima,
Those same acts they use to lower thier entropy can raise entropy just as well it depends on the value (significance) placed on the actions.
EXample: if Antirats throw good rats in zapping walls because, they think the point (significance/value) of the Maze is who can pile up enough dead rats to climb over the walls, They Understanding is devolving thus raising thier entropy.

Looking at the OVERVIEW:
The damage the lowering Entorpy antirats cuase, Then must be Mitigated.
Try to salvage the most growth out as possible. Put the right entities in the right place to salvage. THus growth can come from Tradadgey.
Like wise its possible that these Low entorpy antirats can be nudged to create a Positive growth in the collective whole...

SIdeNote:
*Force and controll can increase decision space in instances too. Having a Job, is controll and forces small set of choices, But the outcome of having money can Increase a much larger reality space.


when an anti-rat throws a rat against a zapping wire, at the level of NPMR, they are throwing themselves against the "karmic" feedback NPMR zapping wire, and incrementally scrambling their QoC data into disorder with each such intentional act, or intent

the process begins to reverse when, at some point, they figure out the link, either organically at the sub-conscious level, or indirectly through a mental pathway

low entropy IUOCs animating a new FWAU have QoC muscle memory inherited, and figure this out very quickly - I believe the feedback is clear, immediate, obvious, and the syntropic reaction is instinctual - hand on stove burns....= do not put hand on stove

high entropy FWAUs are bushwhacking through dense brush and the feedback is not clear, not immediate, not obvious, and a syntropic reaction is not instinctual - the normal reaction is to continue to invest in this negative karmic-like load, feel this obtuse discomfort, and given limited decision space, reach for the bottle or some other escape.

some, through desperate searching, may stumble on a mental pathway out - such as through MBTOE - others may be woken up by a single profound act of love from a low entropy entity within their PMR environment.

_________________
Does this PMR make my butt look big?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 67 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group