Here's a video on 'seeing without eyes' to bring you up to speed
I am aware of it. Like I said, assuming it is true, it's remote viewing, consciousness parsing data-streams - it is not the same as going contrary to the rule-set
The video on Magic is more than 2 hours long, David Copperfield is only one person that is only briefly discussed. What about the Chinese 'face changers'? How about the bloke reaching through a glass window or display cabinet to remove an item?
Of course I referenced just one part as an example, because I am not seriously going to watch an almost 3 hour long conspiracy video lol.
They are magic tricks, things can be manipulated, actors can be hired, things can be edited. I don't think just because you can't see a how a trick was performed that we should assume it to be a real. Their entire shtick is fooling you and on top of that, there is precedent of a multitude of magic acts being revealed which had previously confused people. So why would your first impression be to automatically believe them?
There were plenty of examples of things happening against the rule sets.
Disagree, they are not examples of real "magic" to me. Even if you are inclined to believe it, take the MBT approach of being a open-minded skeptic. Let it be a possibilty rather than a true or false binary thing.