On youtube, someone asked why the question regarding the experiments got cut out.
I can't remember when that question was. Is there any reason why it got cut out?
The editor, Justin, explained this in the comment section of the Youtube video, I will copy-paste it to here:
By your own admission in comments on other videos, you are using the accounts “Claudio Soprano”, “Modeling Coaching”, and “Physics BS Detector with recorder on.” I can only guess that you are also using other accounts here as well. Unfortunately, you have used similar tactics in the past. That alone is likely enough information for most people regarding this matter.
However, I will address the questions/concerns from you and your alias accounts. Let it be known that I am NOT speaking on behalf of Tom or MBT or any others, but only on behalf of myself. I am responding primarily for the sake of clarity for others. I already know from past experiences that engaging in a “discussion” with you will only lead in endless circles.
I was asked to take out your question regarding the experiments because it was too technical of a question for the fireside chat format. I fully agree with and fully support the decision to remove your question. In your question, you referenced very specific labels on multiple diagrams. To address your question appropriately and for viewers to have any idea of what you were talking about, the diagrams of the experiments would be needed as well as more time. Tom explained something along these line to you and suggested that you instead send the question in an email so he could address it properly. As you might recall, he has taken the time to exchange emails with you in the past (2011). With your permission, he posted that exchange in hopes that others mind find it useful:
I can only imagine how many hundreds of emails you have sent Tom over the years. I am truly impressed by his level of patience toward you.
I, myself, suggested removing your health question for several reasons. 1) The question immediately before it addressed the exact same concepts. 2) You first stated that you didn’t really want to talk about the specifics of your health issue (but you ended up still mentioning the specifics). 3) Tom answered your health question (it would seem that you would be satisfied with that and might not want it published). 4) The overall flow of the edit did not work with your other question removed—since your two questions were asked back-to-back. Thus, I put all the pieces together and did my best to make a decision with your privacy in mind as well as the fluidity of the fireside chat.
98% of the fireside chats are left as is. I often omit stumbles, coughs, long pauses, personal chatter, etc. On very rare occasion, a question or short segment will be removed. Some instances are due to technical issues. In some cases, participants have ask that their own question be removed for the sake of privacy. While I’m sure you and your aliases would like to assume that there is some conspiracy behind it all, there is not. The goal with each edit is to present an end product that is as clear, concise, and as useful as possible. The primary goal is not to appease Claudio.
Regarding the claim by you and your aliases that Tom is avoiding challenging questions about the experiments or that there is some conspiracy regarding the matter… Well, that just doesn’t make any logical sense, Claudio. Tom, with the help of others, is working to actually have the experiments completed.
As a side note, the link you are sharing for the unedited video is marked as a privacy/security threat by my DNS security system. Whether that is true or not, I can’t say with any certainty. However, in conjunction with the fact that you are web/tech savvy and that you are using multiple accounts already, it is a concern.
I’ll make a few predictions now, Claudio, based on your patterns over the last decade.
- You will make some ad hominem attacks toward me.
- You will try to bring up a personal matter or otherwise attempt to prod me back into the “discussion.”
- You will claim that people who follow Tom’s work are blind believers, in a cult, etc.
- You will take bits of my post out of context to post in facebook groups or other arenas to try and pull new people into your whirlwind of drama.
- You might do any of the above with a YouTube account that I can only suspect, but not fully confirm is another one of your aliases.
- You will create new accounts on the MBT forum and other arenas from which you have been previously banned to squawk about MBT censorship etc.
It’s the same old pattern, Claudio. Your infatuation with Tom and MBT is, frankly, concerning. I wish you the best and hope you are able to sort out the underlying issue. That’s all I have to say to you and your aliases regarding this matter.