Empty world on videos from a parallel reality (or very good CGI)

Research that could represent a confirmation of an insight based upon Tom Campbell's statements and model of reality.
Forum rules
Please do not post here except for such confirmations and of course for discussion of such confirmations.
Post Reply
gmgm
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2017 4:18 am
Contact:

Empty world on videos from a parallel reality (or very good CGI)

Post by gmgm »

Hello, I tried to do a search if this series of videos was ever mentioned in the forum but neither the city Valencia nor the guy Javier has returned any result.

There is a TikTok user in Spain who claims to be alone in the world. Weird thing he has video proof walking in and out of places, police and fire station, the airport and zoo, TV studios, car dealerships, schools and museums and nobody encounters or stops him.

Electronic appliances state the year is 2027, but he has internet access hooked to this timeline, electricity, street lights, escalators, doors, locks and car engines work normally.

This is a good head start into the story:
This Guy Says He Keeps Waking Up In 2027 All Alone And Videos It Many Times. Strange? Weird? Fake?
[Youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvsCisb ... e=youtu.be[/Youtube]

Either this is a CGI trick, scrubbing all signs of life, or generating a virtual landscape based on the real thing.
OR he fell through the cracks of the simulation and sits now in his own private copy, or rather in the main thing but without direct interaction with other players.

If it is not a clever trick, but he is truly alone there, a series of "glitches" give huge hints how that could work. The footprints on the beach without seeing anybody walking about is a big clue. He is not "busted" by that detail, but this is exactly the way how I would picture a non-shared reality. The parked police car has the engine running, but the blue light is somehow frozen, like in a photo. No moving cars or animated objects (apart of the single plastic bag possibly he threw on the ground). No dust or garbage, no animals. But the trees aren't frozen, wind moves the branches and leaves.

One could pour over all the videos to find the same street sections and how and if cars were moved by the invisible owners. He could leave paper and pen messages (likely must be stashed in a drawer, not on a desktop to keep consistency and avoiding "wonders") and go back to check the reply.

A series of such tests would be possible. How far and how long he needs to move out of the apparent stillframe he is stuck in, to come back to see what happened in the meantime.

But what wonders me a lot, how many disappeared persons through the ages could have ended up in such an empty world, without any concept for what has happened. Javier's first idea was apparently that everybody has died, hence his screen name Unicosobreviviente, meaning sole survivor. He was smart and lucky enough to get to the internet, but how did fare a medieval peasant (or even a king, or somebody even 30 years ago) seeing that everybody else was gone. What if misplaced items in our world are such lost people trying to do something to signal their presence, go out into the "empty houses" to gather tools or fetch food.

Here are some sceptical MSM articles, calling him a troll and prankster, and his channel with his uploads since end of February.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/arti ... ikTok.html

https://www.newsweek.com/viral-tiktok-t ... re-1579085

https://www.tiktok.com/@unicosobreviviente
User avatar
Sainbury
Power Poster
Power Poster
Posts: 6566
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2010 6:54 pm
Location: Ocala, FL
Contact:

Re: Empty world on videos from a parallel reality (or very good CGI)

Post by Sainbury »

This is a complete scam. Time is linear. And what this guy is proposing is impossible.
Last edited by Sainbury on Sun May 23, 2021 9:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
gmgm
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2017 4:18 am
Contact:

Re: Empty world on videos from a parallel reality (or very good CGI)

Post by gmgm »

Sainbury wrote: Sat May 22, 2021 12:16 pm This is a complete scam. Time is sequential. And what this guy is proposing is impossible.
Try to not focus on the date issue, those are only statements made by bugging digital appliances. Newspapers, billboards, best before dates on food items tell it is 2021. If he is legit, and there are constantly new videos coming out, he is in the present but separated away. In my eyes all fits into MBT. He is in the same Quake Arena as everybody else, but sees only the empty space, no other people.
Jdjr
Power Poster
Power Poster
Posts: 1168
Joined: Fri May 04, 2018 8:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Empty world on videos from a parallel reality (or very good CGI)

Post by Jdjr »

gmgm wrote: Sat May 22, 2021 1:47 pm
Sainbury wrote: Sat May 22, 2021 12:16 pm This is a complete scam. Time is sequential. And what this guy is proposing is impossible.
Try to not focus on the date issue, those are only statements made by bugging digital appliances. Newspapers, billboards, best before dates on food items tell it is 2021. If he is legit, and there are constantly new videos coming out, he is in the present but separated away. In my eyes all fits into MBT. He is in the same Quake Arena as everybody else, but sees only the empty space, no other people.
This is a video demonstration of simultaneous time. Past, present and future occur simultaneously. This is also demonstrated in Jane Roberts' Oversoul 7. Campbell has stated that anything is possible. Roberts channeled Seth. Campbell acknowledges that Seth is a teacher. Seth teaches us that time is simultaneous.
User avatar
Specialis Sapientia
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 1233
Joined: Tue Jun 23, 2009 3:05 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

Re: Empty world on videos from a parallel reality (or very good CGI)

Post by Specialis Sapientia »

This is a good example of practising the sceptical part of "open-minded scepticism".

Accepting these videos of evidence of time travel and not an extremely likely hoax is silly.. When there are very easy mundane explanations for this, then it's very likely it is mundane and not something like time travel (which does not exists in the MBT model, as it is illogical).

He is likely a police officer (maybe second job as security guard) during lockdown (he had the key to the station, and other places). In Spain they were quite strict with the lockdown at times, and police officers would patrol streets and public areas, as people needed a valid reason to venture outside, otherwise they would be fined. Showing electronic time/date on a computer is useless as it takes a few seconds to change the date and time..
Another explanation is that it could also be a ARG (Alternate reality game), where company makes something like this to engage the public and create hype for an upcoming film or game, this means it's a larger team that has to resources to easily CGI all this.

Also it makes no sense that he can upload Tik-Tok videos from another time (2027) to the year 2021, and we can interact with him through comments.. Does he claim to only be able to communicate with us through Tik-Tok? He can just upload the original files of the footage if he actually wanted to prove no photo-manipulation, and not on a service that is made for entertainment.

It's not that difficult to create the illusion of no people, especially with newer photoshop software.

Some examples: This article also raises some obvious problems..
Some eagle-eyed TikTok commenters have also spotted some references to the present day in Javier's videos. In one clip, he strolls around the deserted city and heads to the cinema. One of the movie posters outside looked like it was for Wonder Woman 1984, which was released in December 2020. In another clip, Javier goes into a deserted apartment. Although humans have apparently been made extinct, there's not a speck of dust on the tables or chairs. Hm.

Other unanswered questions are how are there footprints in the sand on the beach? How are there ships on the water if there are no humans? Why are the cars so clean!?
In conclusion, this video evidence is extremely thin and can be easily fabricated, no reason to think it's something as reality shattering as it claims to be.

If not, time will tell :-)
-
Jdjr wrote:
gmgm wrote: Sat May 22, 2021 1:47 pm
Sainbury wrote: Sat May 22, 2021 12:16 pm This is a complete scam. Time is sequential. And what this guy is proposing is impossible.
Try to not focus on the date issue, those are only statements made by bugging digital appliances. Newspapers, billboards, best before dates on food items tell it is 2021. If he is legit, and there are constantly new videos coming out, he is in the present but separated away. In my eyes all fits into MBT. He is in the same Quake Arena as everybody else, but sees only the empty space, no other people.
This is a video demonstration of simultaneous time. Past, present and future occur simultaneously. This is also demonstrated in Jane Roberts' Oversoul 7. Campbell has stated that anything is possible. Roberts channeled Seth. Campbell acknowledges that Seth is a teacher. Seth teaches us that time is simultaneous.
No, that is not a part of the MBT model and Tom Campbell has specifically criticised Seth Speaks exactly on the concept of time, as one of the things that 'got lost in translation'. Campbell acknowledges Seth is a teacher, but channeled information can never be perfect, you cannot just take Roberts out of the equation. In the MBT model there is the present where free-will is exercised, and there is the past and future that exists as information in a database, where no free-will is exercised. Time is a kind of technology used the the LCS, and it's linked with the concept of computational cycles at different levels of reality (NPMR has a faster clock than PMR). The sense of simultaneity that people can experience while in NPMR (or when between lives) is more an artefact of the sequence of events in NPMR are generally undetermined from the individual's viewpoint, and not as obvious as in PMR.. the second reason is that individuals have a tendency to not understand the digital nature of reality, and thus the nature of the databases that exists. People tend interpret the information from the databases in a literal sense, and equate them with the ever present now, but that is a limitation of their conceptual thinking and understanding.

Example from this thread:
Tom:
Seth had to deliver his ideas through the constraints of Jane and to the audience of Jane in the 70s timeframe.

I deliver my ideas through the constraints of Tom and to the audience of Tom in the 2000s timeframe.

Seth is difficult to understand logically because it he does not deliver a derivation beginning with first principles. He is more "airy" conceptually while I am more concrete. He states, while I derive.
Tom: MBT is not a rewrite of Seth Speaks just using different metaphors - the two works have some fundamental differences, and many similarities. There is not much to elaborate on. I clearly disagree with Jane's interpretation of what Seth was trying to get across. I find it to be not logical and self-contradictory. This is just one of several areas where MBT and Seth-Jane disagree. Note that Seth-Jane does not describe consciousness as a digital information system which is a core concept in MBT. Neither did Lao Tsu. Did Seth not really understand multidimensional existence (except in general vague terms), or did Jane garble the message or run into personal conceptual limitations, or is it just a disagreement between two different reality models? The answer to that is not available to your personal experience, and since you do not need another belief, you should always go with what makes the most sense to you -- and be open to change as your knowledge increases.
And from this thread:
Tom:
There is a Seth

There was a Jane.

Sometimes Jane had difficulty keeping them differentiated and separate. If you read literature generated within a Christian culture, do not be surprised if it reflects that culture. Everything that comes to PMR from NPMR must arrive by passing through a the filter of a human experience and belief-set.

Expecting pure and un-warped messages from NPMR is naive. Each message is, in part, a reflection of the individual receiving it. Some individuals do not realize this.
Jdjr
Power Poster
Power Poster
Posts: 1168
Joined: Fri May 04, 2018 8:55 pm
Contact:

Re: Empty world on videos from a parallel reality (or very good CGI)

Post by Jdjr »

jdjr:This is a video demonstration of simultaneous time. Past, present and future occur simultaneously. This is also demonstrated in Jane Roberts' Oversoul 7. Campbell has stated that anything is possible. Roberts channeled Seth. Campbell acknowledges that Seth is a teacher. Seth teaches us that time is simultaneous.
No, that is not a part of the MBT model and Tom Campbell has specifically criticised Seth Speaks exactly on the concept of time, as one of the things that 'got lost in translation'. Campbell acknowledges Seth is a teacher, but channeled information can never be perfect, you cannot just take Roberts out of the equation.
I agree that it is not part of the MBT model. Simultaneous time can be translated into MBT. On the subject of simultaneous time, the Seth model as filtered through Jane is also supported by the Elias model as filtered through Mary Ennis.
In the MBT model there is the present where free-will is exercised, and there is the past and future that exists as information in a database, where no free-will is exercised.
You are referring to the constrained reality of this PMR. Free will is retained by the IUOC (permanent avatar) in NPMR.
Time is a kind of technology used the the LCS, and it's linked with the concept of computational cycles at different levels of reality (NPMR has a faster clock than PMR). The sense of simultaneity that people can experience while in NPMR (or when between lives) is more an artefact of the sequence of events in NPMR are generally undetermined from the individual's viewpoint, and not as obvious as in PMR.
The theory of simultaneous time is situated within the contrained rule set of this PMR.
the second reason is that individuals have a tendency to not understand the digital nature of reality, and thus the nature of the databases that exists.
I agree.
People tend interpret the information from the databases in a literal sense, and equate them with the ever present now, but that is a limitation of their conceptual thinking and understanding.
You mean the avatar or human being immersed in a experiential sense data stream.

I have not seen the Campbell quotes. Campbell paints a positive picture of Seth in the quotes previously provided. Thanks.
Post Reply

Return to “Confirmations of things from MBT”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest