Both assertions may be true and not
The current reality, which includes an
array of likely, possible and remote intent outcomes at
each tick of the clock, is indeed subject to
only slight nudging of the available decision
However, with reflection, “education”, and courage,
the IUOC can radically change their decision
path, especially cumulatively over time.
The available array of intents was sticky, but the
accumulation of increasingly mature intent-decision
action-feedback loops constructs your reality
What do you think?
Sounds about right to me.
I tend to think one of the main purposes(all purposes existing within consciousness) of the rule set is to slow things down a bit(quite a bit actually). It gives us time to decide if we really want what it is that we’re creating. It allows us to see and experience how we’re doing it in detail. Of course, one must pay a lot of attention to notice this, and it requires overcoming a lot of fear in order to accept.
Fundamentally, consciousness is subjective is not to say that there is no structure within consciousness. Consciousness creates the structure it wishes to experience.