Avi Tal, please review the video attached to the following thread and provide your thoughts:
Hi John and Sainbury,
Thanks allot for the video.
I must admit that I understood only parts of it.
As far as I can see, the debate between physic scientists is about what is emergent: Conscience from Physical reality or Physical reality from Conscience.
Tom's Virtual Reality theory is a good evidence of the later. His suggested experiments should evidently settle this debate.
My problem is perhaps that I am a "simple person", and when I first saw the double slit experiment with my own eyes in college, I thought: Well, maybe light is a wave, maybe it is particles, these are all physical models. We will never know the "truth".
Tom's experiments bring us closer to the "truth". He suggests (and I agree) that these experiments will make a shift in scientists way of thinking and consequently lead to a new age of technology, where conscience will be able to define the rule set.
I also wish that this will happen and this is why I would like to understand how these experiments are done. I tend to think that they are much more complicated then what appears in Tom's lectures since he explains it to "non-scientists".
Sainbury said "As for your questions about the experiments, I cannot answer those. You will have to wait for the results to be published."
Maybe you know someone who can answer? I think that "material" explanation of these experiments will pull many others to this important mission.
Or, maybe I am wrong? Maybe looking for "real" envelopes and "real" detectors is not the way?