Sorry about that Chief, but so many here make statements and ask questions based upon something that they think they are saying. When the word's don't mean quite what they think and thus the answers are not what they expect, they always say, 'I knew that and what I meant was really something else' followed by a rephrasing or restatement. I can only deal with questions the way they are asked and as I thus understand them. Tom may be a better mind reader than I, but there is a real problem when what we say is not what we think we mean. PMR is a reality, but a virtual one, and one where the rule set means that information does not transfer directly from NPMR or the rest of Consciousness Space but must be interpreted and stated in words as metaphors for reality as expressed elsewhere.
No reason to say sorry, it's fine :)
The concept of gods, God and all the many names for these developed in PMR over a long time starting with primitive concepts and growing from there. They did not necessarily come from NPMR. There has always been an ability for PMR participants to contact Consciousness Space and the concept that everything begins with Mind dates back to before recorded history. So in a sense you can say they came from NPMR, but this is more by inspiration than a direct sourcing. Any contact with Consciousness Space always has had to be interpreted. Contact with Consciousness Space and things that don't match with PMR as a physical reality may be an inspiration for spirituality and religion, but not a direct source as you seem to be asking.
Yes I agree, I also think that the concept of God is very undefinable, makes discussing such thing very hard, the word "God" can mean hundreds of different things.
The God of Abraham developed as part of the conception of God and for reasons centered within PMR. This conception does not fit into the model of reality of MBT. Not as The Big Cheese nor as The One nor as AUM, etc. The Mosaic Code did not come from NPMR or any other aspect of Consciousness Space. Pick a characteristic attributed to the God of Abraham and you will not find it there. No Creator, no jealous God, no eye for an eye, no Heaven, no Hell, no retribution, no original sin, no Karma, no dogma, no karma running over your dogma, no chosen people, no destruction rained from above because of the sins of the people. Where do you want to stop this list? You put the quotation marks around "true", not around God and the phrase, the one true God, has a long history.
Okay, I know that IF such a God existed those attributes would be made by us, the humans, thus I am not asking whether a God exist with those attributes but an entity which those attributes could ge given, by US the humans. The interpretation of such an entity by a human mind would of course be questionable. I am asking if a REAL entity could be the INSPIRATION of this so called Abrahamic God, and then this entity could be misunderstood or the message manipulated and etc.
I am looking for a possible explanation that could take everything into account, I am quite aware of the origin of how any god could appear, because of the power, worship, fear, hope, manipulation, interpretation of NPMR phenomena, limitation of the human mind, psycology, herd mentality, sociology and the list goes on. I am trying to explore all the possibilites.
I have no other answer to give you. Shall we wait and see what Tom has to say further on the subject? Can you find the reference that you refer to and attribute to Tom?
Just to clear it up, Tom didn't mention anything about God, but something about the function of AUM comparable to Big Cheese I think, I read it three days ago.