What you are describing is from deep within the reality of our interactions with and as integral components of The One. It is not what I have called the inward pointing aspect or vector of Intent, as Self Concept. That is personal to each of us as individuated beings as our own understanding of who and what we are. Your idea of an inward pointing vector is from territory that I have not been led to speculate about or given information about: our relations with The One directly. It is not something that I am prepared to disagree with and I think that there is something likely about such a communication as you describe. I would probably feel inhibited about discussing this yet if my reaction to what you have said were not from the right direction. But I do not know if our higher selves are even aware of this consciously. Tom worked with me in working out a post on: Why talk about our Higher Self and our Virtual Reality self?
at this link: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2826
in which we clarified my understanding of the relationship of our higher selves, our virtual reality, VR, selves that experience NPMR and PMR and our relationship with and in our development within The One. As a companion and precursor to this post is another which Tom also worked with me on: Why talk about Indra's Net and the Game of Life?
at this link: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2804
. In part, this was to correlate Tom's MBT
concepts and terminology with confusion that I had caused by starting to talk about Indra's Net on the bulletin board from historical, mystical, sources with the individuated beings connected by the Reality Wide Web or RWW. I do not wish to be a disturbing influence, creating confusion.
As a quick review, I do not see our higher selves and VR selves as a hierarchy with our PMR VR self receiving this signal you describe from our NPMR VR self. We are our higher self and our VR selves are sub sets, but not in a subordinate sense. Our higher self is all us, just differentiated for purposes of experiencing our VR experiences according to the rule sets defining the VRs, into virtual beings. We may or may not consciously perceive the signal you describe in our VR selves, but this is a matter of development and individuality, not that our higher self and then NPMR self must decide to pass it on down the ladder. Our higher selves are components of what became The One in the bootstrapping operation that Tom describes in MBT
and continue in this role. How our higher selves participate within this Union is not something that we know, unless it is known by Tom or someone even higher up the ladder of understanding. I am not aware that he has ever spoken of such knowledge. But we, as part of the Union of The One, continue to be encouraged in our development and the VRs including NPMR and PMR of our system have been created for this purpose and we participate within them for this purpose. Thus a vector/signal such as you describe is very likely to exist and might be thought of as the Intent of The One. I would expect that it is in the nature of a more general signal/desire/intent that we are cherished and a desire that we grow and develop, lower our entropy, gain clarity of communication and understanding, evolve in general and fulfill the purposes and plans of The One. The more specific details that you describe such as hair and eye color appearing in our PMR VR selves as they participate within our PMR experience are more transient and superficial, related only to our own choices and chance and varying from experience packet to packet.
The Intent of The One would be of a more general nature as I have described above and the more general growth and development aspects you mention. If The One were to attempt a more specific directing signal, it would result in a conflict with our Absolute Free Will. Can you imagine trying to herd cats? Also as you discuss, the awareness of this Intent of The One is something that is probably a function of development. I can see a developed awareness of the Intent of The One becoming part of the motivation for our individual Intent to participate in the purposes of The One and align itself with the Intent of The One, provided that there is sufficient advancement on the part of the individuated being. I see this as an end point for the moment, but I may return and add to this post. PMR calls at present.
This calls for Tom's input as well. Thank you for bring such an advanced concept into the discussion forums.